29 October 2026 - Abundance

AI Stocks Rebound, Memory Stocks Surge and SpaceX Offers a Potential Opportunity: Invest Answers Technical Analysis

After a difficult week for AI-related stocks, the market has staged a strong recovery. Memory stocks have surged, semiconductor companies have regained momentum, and Tesla has broken through a key resistance level. SpaceX, meanwhile, has fallen back towards a price range that Invest Answers considers attractive for long-term investors.

In this week’s technical analysis review from Invest Answers, I look at the changing market conditions, the latest price levels for key AI and technology stocks, and the potential opportunities emerging from recent volatility. I also examine the possible rotation from MicroStrategy into SpaceX, including the timing and price levels that could make such a move attractive.

The main theme is that last week’s AI spending fears may have created buying opportunities in companies with strong exposure to AI infrastructure. The recovery has not been uniform, though, and the distinction between companies with strong financial positions and those still struggling to justify their spending remains important.

All prices and observations below reflect the figures discussed in the Invest Answers video and the accompanying screenshots from 28 October 2026. These are the speaker’s technical analysis levels and opinions, not guaranteed outcomes or personalised investment advice.

1. The Market Reversal: Have AI Fears Gone Too Far?

Last week’s sell-off was driven by a combination of concerns about AI spending, inflation, interest rates and the ability of technology companies to generate sufficient returns on their investments. Investors also worried about debt levels and whether the huge capital commitments being made by AI companies could be sustained.

Those fears have eased somewhat this week. One development highlighted by Invest Answers was a reported $63 billion commitment involving Bank of America, Blackstone, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley to purchase Broadcom’s tensor processing units (TPUs). The transaction was presented as evidence that demand for AI computing infrastructure remains strong.

SpaceX also reportedly raised $40 billion on favourable terms, helping ease some concerns about financing conditions in the sector.

The recovery has been particularly strong in semiconductor and memory stocks. Micron, Marvell, Broadcom and SK Hynix have all performed well, while some of the more speculative neocloud companies remain under pressure.

The distinction matters. AI infrastructure suppliers can benefit directly when customers increase their computing capacity, even when investors are questioning the returns earned by the companies operating that infrastructure.

Seven-day market performance

The Invest Answers heatmap, captured on 28 October, showed the following changes over the preceding week:

Micron (MU): +7.13% — strong demand for memory helped the stock recover.
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD): +4.14% — another strong week for semiconductor exposure.
Tesla (TSLA): +4.21% — the stock continued its recovery after breaking through $380.
Marvell Technology (MRVL): +2.59% — the stock rebounded from technical support.
Astera Labs (ALAB): +2.00% — the stock continued to recover from its recent lows.
Broadcom (AVGO): approximately +3.78% — demand for AI infrastructure remains a key driver.
SK Hynix (000660.KS): +14.68% — one of the strongest performers in the heatmap.
SpaceX (SPCX): -9.18% — the stock weakened despite the recovery elsewhere in AI.
Alphabet (GOOGL): -2.87% — earnings and capital expenditure concerns weighed on the shares.
NVIDIA (NVDA): -2.82% — the stock remained under pressure despite the broader recovery.
MicroStrategy (MSTR): -8.43% — weakness in Bitcoin contributed to the decline.
Palantir (PLTR): approximately -3.93% — the stock retreated over the week.

Bitcoin was broadly flat over the seven-day period, while Ethereum and Solana declined. The heatmap makes the central point clear: the recovery has favoured selected AI infrastructure companies rather than the entire technology and cryptocurrency complex.

2. The Latest Technical Analysis Scorecard

One feature I appreciate about the Invest Answers approach is the weekly scorecard. Rather than making price predictions and leaving them unexamined, the speaker compares his earlier calls with subsequent prices.

The 28 October scorecard reviewed 18 calls made on 22 October. The reported results were:

11 hits
5 partial results
2 misses
62% strict accuracy
89% accuracy when partial results are included

The speaker’s method gives partial credit to calls where the price moves close to the forecast level without fully satisfying the prediction. That distinction is important when interpreting the headline accuracy figure.

Among the successful calls were the forecasts for SpaceX to weaken towards the mid-$140s, Tesla to break through $380, Astera Labs to recover from the $250 area, Marvell to rebound from support, and Micron to recover from its lows.

The two misses were Solana and MicroStrategy. The earlier Solana support forecast of $104 failed, while the anticipated recovery in MicroStrategy did not materialise.

A scorecard does not establish that a trading method will remain profitable, but keeping one makes it possible to judge forecasts against actual outcomes rather than relying on memory.

3. Interest Rates, Oil and Market Volatility

The broader macroeconomic picture remains mixed.

Oil prices were still a major concern, with Brent crude reportedly trading above $110 and briefly reaching more than $115. US oil was also above $100, according to the speaker. High energy prices can add to inflationary pressure and complicate the outlook for interest rates.

The video also discussed the possibility of another US Federal Reserve rate hike in December. The speaker cited an approximately 86% probability at the time of recording, while noting that geopolitical developments could affect the outlook.

Despite these concerns, the major US equity indices were showing strength. The speaker expected the S&P 500 to challenge its previous high, while the Nasdaq-100 ETF was recovering from its recent sell-off.

The Nasdaq-100 ETF (QQQ) tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, providing exposure to many of the largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq. Its technical picture had improved, and the speaker noted that the correction had not reached the 200-day moving average.

The 200-day moving average is the average closing price over the previous 200 trading sessions. It is commonly used to assess the longer-term trend: prices above a rising average generally indicate strength, while prices below a falling average can indicate weakness. Traders can calculate it by adding the closing prices for the last 200 sessions and dividing by 200, or use the indicator built into most charting platforms.

The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), which measures the market’s expected volatility for the S&P 500 over roughly the next 30 days, also behaved as the speaker anticipated. It spiked to around 23 before falling back towards 17. Invest Answers had expected a volatility spike at roughly six-week intervals and suggested another could arrive before Christmas.

That is a forecast rather than a dependable schedule. The VIX can help investors assess market stress, but it does not tell them exactly when a correction will begin or end.

4. Bitcoin, Gold and the Cryptocurrency Outlook

Bitcoin (BTC)

Bitcoin briefly broke below the $81,600 support level identified in the previous video before recovering. The speaker attributed part of the weakness to negative comments from prominent market participants and the resulting disruption to exchange-traded fund flows.

At the time of the review, Bitcoin was trading around $81,000, with the broader trend showing signs of recovery. The key levels identified were:

Support: approximately $80,000–$82,000.
Resistance: approximately $87,000.
Longer-term expectation: a recovery through resistance could improve momentum into November and December.

The speaker also examined Bitcoin relative to gold. His longer-term thesis is that Bitcoin could rise from approximately 12 ounces of gold per Bitcoin towards 40 ounces. This is a directional forecast, not a price target supported by a fixed timetable.

For investors holding Bitcoin-related equities, the distinction between Bitcoin’s price and the share price of a company holding Bitcoin is important. Corporate financing, share issuance, valuation premiums and investor sentiment can all cause the shares to behave differently from the underlying cryptocurrency.

Solana (SOL)

Solana fell below the previously identified $104 support level, trading around $102–$103 during the review. The speaker acknowledged that the forecast had failed and that cryptocurrency markets remained weak.

There was no clear technical basis in the video for declaring that Solana had established a new floor. Investors should therefore be cautious about assuming that the previous support level will automatically become support again.

Ethereum (ETH)

Ethereum was also weak, with the speaker highlighting persistent selling pressure in Ethereum exchange-traded funds. He noted that Bitcoin had experienced more positive fund-flow days than Ethereum during the period discussed.

The video did not establish a strong recovery signal for Ethereum. The price remained broadly flat to lower, and the speaker did not present a convincing near-term catalyst.

5. MicroStrategy (MSTR): Wait for Bitcoin to Recover Before Rotating

MicroStrategy, now operating under the Strategy brand, is a Bitcoin treasury company that holds substantial Bitcoin reserves and uses capital-market transactions to finance its strategy.

Its shares can move much more sharply than Bitcoin itself. This can create opportunities during strong cryptocurrency rallies, but it also exposes shareholders to substantial downside when Bitcoin falls or investors lose confidence in the company’s financing model.

The speaker’s short-term view was bearish. The expected bounce had failed, Bitcoin weakness had weighed on the shares, and the technical picture still showed a sell signal.

He also discussed Strategy’s preferred security, STRC, which had recovered towards $100. He remained invested in STRC for its dividend income but did not consider the recovery sufficient evidence that Strategy’s wider financing model would necessarily regain its previous momentum.

The proposed rotation from MicroStrategy into SpaceX

This was one of the most interesting discussions in the video, particularly for investors who already hold MicroStrategy and are considering increasing their exposure to SpaceX.

The speaker’s argument was that MicroStrategy could remain the faster-moving asset over the next few weeks if Bitcoin recovered, while SpaceX could offer better long-term growth over a period of one to three years.

He did not recommend selling MicroStrategy immediately at a loss simply to buy SpaceX. Instead, he described a staged rotation based on the relative prices of the two investments.

The price levels to watch

MicroStrategy around $160: a potential area to begin reducing the position if Bitcoin’s recovery supports the share price.
MicroStrategy around $175: another potential level at which to take profits or reduce exposure.
MicroStrategy around $250: the speaker’s illustrative expectation if Bitcoin approaches $100,000 again. This is a forecast, not a confirmed target.
SpaceX around $140–$150: the area where the speaker sees potential value, particularly if continued share unlocks maintain selling pressure.

The suggested approach was to sell portions of the MicroStrategy position, potentially around 15%–20% at a time as the shares recover, and redirect the proceeds into SpaceX when the relative prices are favourable.

The speaker also suggested watching the end-of-year period closely. If Bitcoin rises towards $100,000, MicroStrategy could recover sharply. If SpaceX remains near $140–$150 because of selling pressure from share unlocks, the investor might obtain a more attractive exchange between the two assets by waiting rather than rotating immediately.

There is a clear trade-off here. MicroStrategy could outperform in a short, sharp Bitcoin rally, while SpaceX could offer stronger long-term growth if its business expansion and valuation expectations are realised.

Use a relative-price chart rather than watching each stock in isolation

The speaker recommended creating a pair chart to track MicroStrategy against SpaceX. A pair chart compares the relative performance of two assets rather than examining either price alone.

For example, dividing the price of MicroStrategy by the price of SpaceX produces a ratio that can be tracked over time. If the ratio rises, MicroStrategy is outperforming SpaceX; if it falls, SpaceX is outperforming MicroStrategy.

The ratio does not by itself establish fair value or identify the ideal time to switch. It does, though, help investors see whether the relative price has moved in a direction that supports their planned rotation.

My main takeaway is that the speaker is not simply choosing SpaceX over MicroStrategy at any price. He is looking for an opportunity to exchange an asset that may benefit from a near-term Bitcoin recovery for one he believes has stronger longer-term prospects.

Investors considering this strategy should also account for transaction costs, tax consequences, the possibility that either stock moves sharply before the desired price is reached, and the fact that both investments carry significant risks.

6. SpaceX (SPCX): The Long-Term Opportunity

SpaceX is a private aerospace company known for its reusable rockets, satellite-launch services and Starlink satellite internet business. The investment thesis discussed in the video also places considerable emphasis on its planned expansion into AI computing infrastructure.

The speaker was particularly bullish on SpaceX’s long-term prospects, arguing that its ability to build computing capacity quickly could give it an advantage as demand for AI infrastructure grows.

He discussed forecasts involving 10–13 gigawatts of computing capacity and potential annual revenue of $350–$400 billion in 2027. These are highly ambitious projections presented by the speaker, not established revenue figures. Investors should independently assess the assumptions behind them before using them to justify a valuation.

The SpaceX entry price

The technical picture was weak in the short term. SpaceX had fallen approximately 9.18% over the seven-day period shown in the heatmap, and the speaker identified a downward trend and sell signals.

Despite that weakness, he continued to favour the $140–$142 area as an attractive long-term buying range. The chart showed repeated reactions around this level, which he treated as support.

Preferred entry: approximately $140–$142.
Broader watch range: approximately $140–$150.
Short-term outlook: weak while the downtrend and selling pressure persist.
Long-term thesis: growth in satellite communications, launch services and AI computing infrastructure.

The speaker also highlighted the effect of share unlocks, which can allow existing holders to sell previously restricted shares. An increase in the supply of shares available for trading can put pressure on the market price even when the underlying business outlook has not changed.

He described SpaceX at these levels as an opportunity to build a position gradually rather than commit all available capital at once.

Why the next Starship milestone matters

The video also discussed the planned recovery of both the Starship vehicle and its Super Heavy booster, often referred to as a double catch. Successfully demonstrating the recovery of both stages would be an important step towards the company’s goal of full reusability.

Greater reusability could improve launch economics and support a higher launch cadence, though the commercial benefits would depend on successful testing, operational reliability and the cost of maintaining the system.

The speaker expected another opportunity to demonstrate the capability within roughly a week or two, based on his comments at the time. That was a near-term expectation, not a confirmed launch date.

For investors, the main issue is whether SpaceX can translate its technical progress into reliable, profitable operations while executing its ambitious plans for satellite communications and computing infrastructure.

7. Tesla (TSLA): A Breakout Above $380

Tesla manufactures electric vehicles and develops battery storage, energy products, autonomous-driving technology and robotics. The speaker remains bullish on the company, with particular emphasis on its future autonomous vehicle and Cybercab plans.

Tesla was one of the strongest stocks discussed in the video. It had risen from the mid-$300s to above $400 within seven trading days, breaking through the $380 level that the speaker had identified as a key threshold.

The earlier forecast called for Tesla to hold above $380 and then move towards $400. That move had occurred by the time of the review.

What comes next?

Previous breakout level: $380.
Price at the time of review: approximately $402–$405.
Potential upside scenario: $450, with $500 discussed as a more ambitious possibility.

The higher targets depend on continued progress with the Cybercab programme, the possible achievement of around 2,000 Cybercabs by Christmas, and the market’s assessment of Tesla’s future business prospects.

The speaker also noted uncertainty around a possible SpaceX acquisition or merger involving Tesla, including the timing and the terms. Such uncertainty can affect the share price, so investors should not treat a potential transaction as a confirmed catalyst.

Although the technical trend had turned positive, the speaker warned against chasing a stock after a rapid advance. An investor who missed the move towards $400 might obtain a better entry during a pullback, rather than buying simply because the price has broken out.

8. NVIDIA (NVDA): AI’s Leading Chip Supplier

NVIDIA designs graphics processing units and related computing systems widely used to train and run artificial intelligence models. It remains one of the central suppliers in the AI infrastructure market.

The speaker identified $212 as a buying level in the previous review. The stock subsequently recovered modestly, trading around $215–$217 in the latest figures.

His chart showed NVIDIA recovering from a period of concern about AI capital expenditure, though the stock had not yet made a decisive move higher.

Recent entry level: approximately $212.
Price at review: approximately $216.
Short-term view: recovering, but still vulnerable to changes in market sentiment.

The screenshot also listed a longer-term target of $260, approximately 22% above the price used in that target calculation. This should be treated as a forecast rather than a guaranteed outcome.

Investors should watch whether spending on AI computing continues to translate into orders and earnings growth for NVIDIA. The long-term business opportunity may be substantial, but the share price remains sensitive to expectations about future spending.

9. SK Hynix (000660.KS): Memory Is Back in Focus

SK Hynix is a South Korean semiconductor manufacturer and a major supplier of high-bandwidth memory, which is used in advanced AI accelerators and other demanding computing applications.

The speaker highlighted the stock as one of the clearest examples of a technical rebound working as expected. His earlier call identified a floor around KRW 1.2 million, and the stock subsequently recovered sharply.

The heatmap showed a weekly gain of approximately 14.68%, while the scorecard recorded a move from around KRW 1.223 million to KRW 1.487 million. These figures refer to different points in the review and should not be treated as identical snapshots.

The 200-day moving average signal

At the time of the video, SK Hynix was trading around its 200-day moving average. The speaker considered this notable because the stock had spent a long period above that level.

When a fundamentally strong company falls below its 200-day moving average during a broader bull market, some investors use the move as a reason to investigate a potential entry. The indicator is not a guarantee of a rebound, and the price can remain below the average for an extended period.

The speaker’s case rests on the combination of the recent rebound, improving technical signals and continued demand for memory used in AI infrastructure.

The screenshot’s longer-term target indicator listed KRW 1.6 million, approximately 23.6% above its reference price. This is a projected level, not a confirmed price destination.

10. Micron Technology (MU): Another Memory Stock to Watch

Micron Technology designs and manufactures memory and storage products, including DRAM and NAND flash memory. Its products are used in data centres, personal computers, smartphones and other computing systems.

Micron had risen approximately 7.13% over the week shown in the heatmap, with the speaker noting another strong advance during the latest trading session.

The move was linked to improving sentiment towards memory stocks, particularly following the sharp recovery in SK Hynix. Micron can benefit when demand for AI servers and other data-centre systems increases the need for high-performance memory.

The speaker’s technical view was positive, with the trend pointing upwards and a buy signal in place. He also argued that increased capital expenditure by major cloud companies could support suppliers such as Micron, even when the market initially interprets higher spending as a negative.

That argument depends on the spending translating into profitable demand for memory. Investors should still monitor pricing, supply, margins and the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry.

The longer-term target indicator shown in the screenshot was $490, approximately 51.6% above its reference price. This is an ambitious forecast and should not be mistaken for an independently verified valuation.

11. Marvell Technology (MRVL): Recovery Towards $300

Marvell Technology designs semiconductor products for data infrastructure, including networking, data-centre connectivity and custom silicon used in demanding computing applications.

The speaker had identified a rising technical channel for Marvell and expected the stock to rebound from its lower boundary. The subsequent move supported that view, with the scorecard recording a rise from approximately $223 to $252.50.

The stock’s weekly heatmap performance was positive, up approximately 2.59%, while the scorecard showed a gain of around 13% from its earlier reference price.

Earlier support level: approximately $222–$223.
Price in the scorecard: $252.50.
Potential technical target: around $300–$322 over the following months.

The speaker discussed a possible acquisition by Marvell, which could explain some of the subsequent share-price movement. He did not have enough information during the video to assess the transaction’s effect on earnings or whether it would improve the company’s competitive position.

For that reason, he was not making an immediate additional buying recommendation based on the price dip alone. The acquisition needs to be assessed before the investment case can be updated.

12. Broadcom (AVGO): AI Infrastructure Exposure

Broadcom develops semiconductors and infrastructure software. Its semiconductor business includes networking products and custom chips used in data centres, making the company a major supplier to the expanding AI infrastructure market.

The speaker had identified a buying zone around $330–$335. The stock briefly fell below that area, reaching approximately $318–$319, before recovering.

His advice was not to assume the initial support level would hold perfectly. Instead, he suggested waiting for signs that the stock had turned upwards before entering, particularly for investors who did not already own shares.

The distinction is useful because support levels are areas of potential buying interest rather than exact floors. A stock can move below support before recovering, or it can continue falling if market conditions deteriorate.

Broadcom remains a company to watch because demand for custom AI chips and networking infrastructure could support future growth. Its commercial position and financial performance still need to justify the valuation investors are being asked to pay.

13. Astera Labs (ALAB): A Strong Reaction Around $250

Astera Labs develops semiconductor-based connectivity solutions that help move data between processors, memory and other components in data-centre systems. Its products are relevant to the growing demand for high-performance AI infrastructure.

The speaker highlighted Astera Labs as a successful example of buying near a repeated technical support level. He had identified the $250 area as a level to watch, and the stock subsequently rebounded strongly.

The scorecard showed a move from approximately $257.82 to $298.66, a gain of about 15.8%. The heatmap also showed a positive weekly result.

The speaker argued that the stock had repeatedly reacted around the $250 level since the summer. He viewed this as evidence of a useful support zone, particularly after the recent market sell-off.

Investors should still distinguish between a repeated historical price reaction and a reliable forecast. Support can fail, especially if earnings expectations or demand for the company’s products weaken.

The screenshot’s longer-term target indicator listed $500, approximately 90.3% above its reference price. That represents a highly optimistic scenario rather than a near-term technical target.

14. Alphabet (GOOGL): Strong Business, Weaker Technical Picture

Alphabet, Google’s parent company, operates Google Search, YouTube, Google Cloud and a range of advertising and AI services. It remains a major technology business, but the speaker was less enthusiastic about its near-term prospects than about several smaller AI infrastructure suppliers.

The stock came under pressure after earnings, with the speaker highlighting a reported earnings-per-share result of approximately $2.12 against an expectation of $3. He also discussed an increase in planned capital expenditure from roughly $195 billion to $205 billion.

The figures are those cited during the video and should be checked against the company’s official earnings release before being used in a detailed valuation.

The market reaction reflected concern that higher spending might not translate into earnings quickly enough. The speaker argued that this interpretation could overlook the benefits flowing to companies supplying the computing infrastructure.

Alphabet’s weaker share price could therefore have different implications for different investors. Those seeking exposure to the infrastructure suppliers might view its spending plans as supportive of the sector, while Alphabet shareholders must assess whether the additional investment will produce sufficient returns.

The 200-day moving average warning

The speaker noted that Alphabet had fallen approximately 15% below its 200-day moving average, describing the distance as unusually large compared with recent history.

He also discussed a possible price target above $400, with buying below $300 offering substantial potential upside if that target were achieved. The longer-term target indicator in the screenshot was $400, approximately 23.9% above its reference price.

His overall view was mixed: Alphabet remains a strong business with major AI opportunities, but he considers it less dynamic than some of the companies supplying the infrastructure behind AI development.

15. CleanSpark (CLSK): Bitcoin Mining and High-Performance Computing

CleanSpark operates Bitcoin-mining infrastructure and has also been positioning itself to participate in the high-performance computing market.

The speaker had previously endorsed the idea of buying long-dated call options when the stock was around $8. The share price subsequently recovered towards $8.50, with the scorecard showing a move from $8.00 to $8.34.

He viewed the rebound as encouraging, while noting that the stock had briefly fallen below $8 before recovering.

For investors considering long-dated call options, or LEAPS, it is important to remember that these contracts provide the right to buy shares at a specified strike price before or at expiration, depending on the contract. Their value depends on the share price, time remaining, volatility and other factors. A correct directional view does not guarantee a profitable options trade.

The longer-term investment case depends on CleanSpark’s ability to operate its mining business effectively and develop profitable high-performance computing operations. The company should not be treated as equivalent to a pure AI infrastructure supplier without examining the scale and economics of its computing business.

16. Lam Research (LRCX): Semiconductor Equipment for the Next Phase of AI

Lam Research supplies equipment used to manufacture semiconductors. Its products are part of the production process for advanced chips and memory, making it an indirect beneficiary of investment in AI computing infrastructure.

The speaker highlighted a recent recovery from the $220 area and regarded the company’s long-term prospects favourably. He also mentioned a possible connection to Tesla and SpaceX’s proposed Terafab semiconductor manufacturing project.

That relationship would be relevant if it resulted in meaningful equipment orders, but the details and financial impact need to be confirmed rather than assumed.

Among the companies discussed, the speaker preferred Lam Research over Applied Materials (AMAT), citing his assessment of Lam’s prospects and its potential connection to the Terafab project.

The main investment case is that continued demand for advanced chips and memory requires investment in the equipment used to manufacture them. Investors should still examine order trends, margins, capital spending and the timing of any new manufacturing projects.

17. Cerebras (CBRS): A Speculative AI Computing Opportunity

Cerebras develops specialised AI computing systems and is focused on the infrastructure required to train and run large AI models.

The speaker discussed a recent decline associated with weakness across the neocloud sector, along with concerns raised by a short report that he had not yet read in full.

He identified the $103–$105 area as a potential support zone and described the technical picture as encouraging. The scorecard and discussion pointed to a recovery from around $104 towards $110–$112.

He argued that future deployments in Oracle data centres could support demand for Cerebras systems, particularly as inference workloads grow. Inference is the process of using a trained AI model to generate responses, predictions or other outputs.

The opportunity remains speculative. Investors should examine the company’s financial position, customer commitments, competitive position and ability to turn demand into sustainable revenue. A favourable technical signal does not resolve those business risks.

18. UMAC: A Recovery from $16

The speaker also highlighted UMAC, which he had previously identified as attractive around $16.

The stock briefly fell to approximately $15.70 before recovering towards $17.27. The scorecard classified the earlier call as a hit.

The speaker described the stock as oversold on shorter timeframes, but noted that the longer daily and 12-hour charts had not yet produced the same buy signal. A signal appeared on the six-hour chart.

This illustrates why traders sometimes compare multiple chart timeframes. A daily chart helps assess the broader trend, while shorter charts can show more immediate changes in momentum. Shorter timeframes also tend to produce more frequent and potentially less reliable signals.

The longer-term target indicator in the screenshot listed $40, approximately 152% above its reference price. That is a highly speculative target and should not be confused with the nearer-term recovery towards $17–$18.

19. Other Stocks and Market Observations

Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)

AMD designs processors and graphics chips used in personal computers, servers and AI systems. The heatmap showed a weekly gain of approximately 4.14%, but the earlier scorecard’s forecast for a rebound from around $571 had failed, with the stock subsequently falling towards $510.

This is a useful reminder that a positive week does not necessarily mean a previous technical forecast was correct. Investors should assess the current price and trend rather than rely on an earlier call.

Palantir Technologies (PLTR)

Palantir develops data analysis and software platforms used by commercial businesses and government organisations. The speaker expected the stock to move back above $200 after a recovery in its technical signals.

The seven-day heatmap remained negative, and the scorecard classified the earlier call as a partial result. The outlook therefore depended on the recovery continuing rather than on a confirmed breakout.

CoreWeave and the neocloud sector

The speaker was less positive about the neocloud companies than about the established semiconductor and memory suppliers. He argued that concerns about financing and the economics of AI infrastructure had affected this group more severely.

CoreWeave is an AI cloud computing provider. Its business depends on supplying computing capacity to customers, but the economics of that model need to be examined alongside debt, infrastructure costs, customer commitments and the returns generated by its assets.

The wider lesson is that rising demand for AI computing does not automatically mean every company building or leasing computing capacity will produce attractive shareholder returns.

20. Putting the Investment Opportunities Together

The latest Invest Answers review presents a market in which the AI trade has recovered, but investors still need to select their exposure carefully.

The strongest technical rebounds came from memory and semiconductor infrastructure companies, including SK Hynix, Micron, Marvell and Astera Labs. Tesla also broke through an important price level, while SpaceX remained under pressure despite the speaker’s positive long-term outlook.

The speaker’s preference is for businesses that he believes can benefit directly from growing AI infrastructure demand. That includes chip designers, memory manufacturers, semiconductor equipment suppliers and SpaceX’s planned computing expansion.

Alphabet presents a different situation. Its earnings reaction and distance below the 200-day moving average suggest that the market is questioning the pace and return on its investment. Yet its capital expenditure could support suppliers elsewhere in the industry.

The most interesting portfolio decision may be the relative value between MicroStrategy and SpaceX. The speaker believes MicroStrategy could benefit from a near-term Bitcoin recovery, while SpaceX offers stronger long-term prospects. His preferred approach is to wait for favourable relative prices and rotate in stages rather than make a large, immediate switch.

For investors following these ideas, the key is to distinguish between three things: a technical entry level, a longer-term valuation thesis and a forecast that depends on future events. They are related, but they are not interchangeable.

Conclusion: Stocks and Price Levels to Watch

The following is a recap of the main entry levels and targets discussed in the video. These are the speaker’s stated levels or projections, not independently verified fair values. Where the transcript did not provide a clear entry and target, I have not invented one.

SpaceX (SPCX): Preferred entry around $140–$142, with a broader watch range of $140–$150. The speaker favours gradual accumulation and sees the company as a strong long-term AI computing opportunity.
MicroStrategy (MSTR): Watch for a possible recovery towards $160–$175 as potential levels to begin staged selling. A move towards $250 is an illustrative scenario if Bitcoin approaches $100,000. Consider rotating proceeds into SpaceX only when the relative prices justify it.
Tesla (TSLA): The $380 breakout has occurred, with $400 reclaimed. The speaker discussed $450 as a possible next level and $500 as a more ambitious scenario, dependent on continued business progress.
NVIDIA (NVDA): The earlier entry level was around $212. The longer-term target indicator was $260.
SK Hynix (000660.KS): The earlier support level was around KRW 1.2 million. The longer-term target indicator was KRW 1.6 million.
Micron Technology (MU): The longer-term target indicator was $490. The speaker’s technical view was positive following the memory-stock recovery.
Marvell Technology (MRVL): The earlier support level was around $222–$223, with a potential technical target of $300–$322. The acquisition discussed in the video requires further assessment.
Broadcom (AVGO): The preferred buying zone was $330–$335, with the speaker advising investors to wait for a turn upwards if the price falls below support.
Astera Labs (ALAB): The $250 area was identified as support. The longer-term target indicator was $500.
Alphabet (GOOGL): The speaker discussed buying below $300 and a target above $400. The stock’s weak technical position and capital expenditure plans remain key considerations.
CleanSpark (CLSK): The earlier entry discussion centred on $8 for long-dated call options. The scorecard showed a partial result at $8.34.
Lam Research (LRCX): The speaker highlighted a recovery from around $220 but did not give a firm price target in the transcript.
Cerebras (CBRS): The $103–$105 area was identified as potential support. No firm longer-term target was established in the discussion.
UMAC: The earlier entry level was $16, with a longer-term target indicator of $40. This remains a speculative idea.
Bitcoin (BTC): The main support area was $80,000–$82,000, with resistance around $87,000.
Solana (SOL): The previous $104 support level failed, with the price trading around $102–$103 during the review. No confirmed replacement support level was provided.
Ethereum (ETH): The speaker remained cautious and did not provide a convincing new entry level or price target.
QQQ: The Nasdaq-100 ETF’s technical trend had recovered, but no new numerical entry target was established in the discussion.
AMD: The earlier forecast of a rebound from around $571 failed. No new entry level or target was confirmed.
Palantir (PLTR): The speaker expected a recovery above $200, but the earlier call remained a partial result.

My main takeaway is that the recent volatility may be creating opportunities in selected AI infrastructure companies, but the best entries are not necessarily the stocks that have already rebounded most sharply.

SpaceX remains the most interesting long-term idea in the speaker’s analysis, particularly around $140–$142. For investors already holding MicroStrategy, the more measured approach is to watch Bitcoin’s recovery and the relative price of the two assets, then consider rotating in stages if MicroStrategy reaches the proposed selling levels while SpaceX remains attractively priced.

As always, the price levels are reference points rather than instructions to buy or sell. Business performance, valuation, market conditions and personal risk tolerance still matter.